SEARCH
Tata Vs Mistry: Mere existence of veto right has been misconstrued as oppression and mismanagement, says Tata Sons counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi
CNBC-TV18
2020-01-02
Views
135
Description
Share / Embed
Download This Video
Report
Tata Vs Mistry: Mere existence of veto right has been misconstrued as oppression and mismanagement, says Tata Sons counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi
Show more
Share This Video
facebook
google
twitter
linkedin
email
Video Link
Embed Video
<iframe width="600" height="350" src="https://vclip.net//embed/x7pykvk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Preview Player
Download
Report form
Reason
Your Email address
Submit
RELATED VIDEOS
04:22
Tata- Mistry Case: Precedent For Oppression And Mismanagement Claims
00:55
Tata-Mistry Feud Mistry challenges his removal; Singhvi senior counsel for Tatas in case
08:51
Ican Investment's Singhvi Speaks On Tata-Mistry Slugfest
01:48
Nitin Gadkari Says His Remarks On Vijay Mallya Were Misconstrued
01:30
'Stranger Things' Star Says His Opinion on Israel-Hamas War Has Been 'Misconstrued'
03:41
My words have been misconstrued and twisted: ML Khattar on his statement on beef/muslims
02:21
My comments might have been misconstrued: Shahrukh
01:41
Kapar MP says sorry if Menu Rahmah comments were misconstrued
01:19
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs says Kanye West’s statements often ‘misconstrued’ amid ‘White Lives Matter’ scandal!
04:00
Demi Lovato Issues APOLOGY To Froyo Store After 'Misconstrued' Message!
01:56
T.J. Miller Says Ryan Reynolds Contacted Him Over “Misconstrued” Comments About ‘Deadpool’ Set | THR News
01:51
Tata vs Mistry: SC rules in favour of Tata Group, backs removal of Cyrus Mistry
