The Delhi police have arrested #UmarKhalid for allegedly inciting the communal carnage that tore through Delhi in February this year, and charged him under the anti-terrorism law UAPA. The activist’s “crime”? He made speeches at protests against the citizenship law urging people to hit the street during American president Donald Trump’s visit to Delhi. According to the police, Khalid’s “provocative speeches” were part of a “conspiracy” to incite violence in the capital. As “evidence”, they have cited an edited speech of Khalid shared on social media by BJP leaders.

The police have also named #HarshMander in one of the chargesheets related to the carnage filed in June. The veteran social justice activist, the chargesheet claimed, “instigated the protesters to not have faith in the Supreme Court and to fight their battle on road to get justice. He however used a façade of peace in a part of his speech.”

If what Khalid and Mander said is construed as “#hatespeech”, what do we call the poison that BJP leaders, present and past, have injected into India’s national discourse? And if Khalid’s and Mander’s words are prosecutable offences, as the Indian state and its agents insist they are, why aren’t those of people like Kapil Mishra, Anurag Thakur, LK Advani, Uma Bharti, Sadhvi Rithambara?

Clearly, the standards for what qualifies as ‘hate speech’ are quite selective.

Sign up for our all-new media newsletter: https://bit.ly/StopPressNewsletter

Support independent media and subscribe to Newslaundry: http://bit.ly/paytokeepnewsfree

To watch this and many more videos, click on http://www.newslaundry.com/

Follow and engage with us on social media:
Facebook: https://facebook.com/newslaundry
Twitter: https://twitter.com/newslaundry
Instagram: https://instagram.com/newslaundry